[Photographer, b. 1945, Newport Beach, California, d. 2014, Paris.]
I believed it was necessary to investigate photography, dismantle it, jettison all the non-essential components, and begin again with a stripped down but more powerful idea of what is, or could be “photographic.”
It might be more useful, if not necessarily more true, to think of photography as a narrow, deep area between the novel and film.
I assumed from the outset that photography was already art, and that I and other people working in photography were artists. I understand now that this was a minority point of view.
I never had any profound loyalty to the idea of photography as a medium but simply as the most efficient way of making or recording an image.
I used photography to distance myself from a world that I loathed and was powerless to improve.
...you don’t put an object in a museum because it’s beautiful; an object is beautiful because you put it in a museum. Everything is photogenic once it has been photographed.
The ideal photographic document would appear to be without author or art.
…the questioning of the photograph in its relation to the reality, the interrogation of representation, the famous crisis of representation, really all took place before digital technology. Digital technology, you see, is not the villain here. (1998)